| Message |
#1, calm down. #2, stop comparing cars that are in two different categories. Yes, they're both Zs, but they weren't exactly created equally. Notice how the 350Z is considerably cheaper than the Z32 TT was when it was first introduced. There's a reason for that. One may do something better than the other and vice versa. Big deal. #3, yeah, I'm afraid you are going to need a time machine to go back to 1990, pick up a brand new Z32 and bring it back to have a track battle under the same conditions here in 2007 (or whatever year 350Z you wish to compare your relic to) in order to really make a relevant and worthwhile comparison, if you must. However, if you don't have access to a time machine, you could always just pull up random performance data, print it out and gawk at it like you're 8 years old, reading comic books. Get together with LJZTT so he can wave around his antiquated Z32 performance stats, rant, rave and ramble on and on about how HICAS ownz all. Have fun!
 -Brad
1992 Z32 2+2 NA
1996 B14 SE-R
1986 Z31 Coupe NA (For Sale)
________________________ Rule #1: It's just a car. "It's your car, do what you want." "SOunds like your spoiled." - Nis300owner on May 18, 2007 at 2:27 PM
"...when i've been in florida, people drive crazy, dangerous, and fast." - ARA300ZX on January 10, 2007 at 12:06 PM
"You were 100% correct." - Kenny on October 10, 2006 at 1:15 PM
"2+2s must be carnivorous. Right Brad?" - Barry'z (NJ) on July 29, 2006 at 11:39 PM
"car or kitten... ill kick the crap out of it!" - VG30DE racer on July 14, 2006 at 3:45 PM
"They turn their head because the 2+2 is sooo long." - ZJeweler(ssm300z) on July 13, 2006 at 4:43 PM
"The Z was meant for the track, not the dragstrip." - Moxie on May 01, 2006 at 3:03 PM
"Let me brake the news to all those ignorant old folks in this forum." - nightriderZ on July 14, 2005 at 2:33 AM
"...Stage III does require an ECU upgrade MORAN..." - djtz1 on June 29, 2005 at 3:34 PM |
 |
16:29:33 08/30/07
